Resisting the Erosion of Empathy: The Hunger Games, Collectivity and Resistance

Written by Eleen Zhou
OPINION
Panem et Circenses: bread and circuses. The Roman phrase denotes the distraction of the masses by means of superficial placation—an idea that is built into the very name of The Hunger Games’ world. Suzanne Collins thus introduces us to Panem: a society whose power structure rests on a foundation of violence and exploitation. Built upon the ruins of North America, this is a country that seems to have inherited its worst legacies. An authoritarian regime centralized in the Capitol rules over Panem with an iron fist; while bread is made scarce at its source, the small elite hoards wealth at the expense of the masses. The districts hunger so that the Capitol may gorge. With this simple choice of name, Collins sets the scene for an investigation into the socio-political edifices of her world, one that presents a timely reflection of our own reality. Panem, as the reader learns, is named in irony.
Little less than two decades ago, the Hunger Games ignited the publishing scene, revolutionizing the YA novel and swiftly cementing its place in the pantheon of pop culture. Through the eyes of Katniss Everdeen, we are plunged into a post-apocalyptic dystopia where twelve districts scrabble in the opulent shadow of the Capitol, and their children are offered up for slaughter in its annual televised bloodbath: the titular Games. As our protagonist contends with survival, she grapples with her place in her ruthless society as well as the line she toes in preserving her own humanity.
Katniss Everdeen herself is fascinating. A child of District Twelve, both literally and metaphorically, she has borne, from birth, the brunt of the Capitol’s brutality. Having lived in scarcity all her life, she knows what it means to starve for the hedonistic satiety of those ensconced in its marble walls. Orphaned by both her mother’s neglect and the death of her father, Katniss is, at a young age, forced to take up the mantle of provider. Over and over again, she witnesses unimaginable cruelty; over and over again, she’s left scarred and traumatized at the hands of those in power. She is calloused, pockmarked, and mired in ash. Yet, Katniss, despite it all, is kind.
The reader first meets our protagonist on the deprived, coal-dusted streets of the seam. Upon our introduction to her, we are told:
“Even though it was years ago, I think he still remembers how I tried to drown him in a bucket when Prim brought him home. Scrawny kitten, belly swollen with worms, crawling with fleas. The last thing I needed was another mouth to feed. But Prim begged so hard, cried even, I had to let him stay.” (The Hunger Games, page 1)
In just a few lines, Collins paints a striking portrait: Katniss, the girl who kept a cat alive for her sister; Katniss, to whom Prim means more than anything. This, we learn, is what defines her to her bone. Deeply caring and fiercely protective, her love for her community and those dear to her drives her every action. Thus, Suzanne Collins’ opening words establish the two fundamental pillars of Katniss’ psyche: survival and compassion. Her character and the novel as a whole are poignant precisely because of this battle of dichotomies. She is someone for whom self-preservation has been deeply and immovably present in every facet of existence—someone who has had every reason to forsake empathy. Still, in a world where kindness has been made costly, Katniss’ kindness remains intact, and that becomes the Capitol’s greatest existential threat.
The question of affording compassion is one that plagues the narrative; amidst the Capitol-enforced atrocity of the arena, Katniss’ inner conflict is given center stage. As the novel wends its course, our protagonist’s nature comes into constant combat with itself, and her values are tried mercilessly. Yet, from the first page of the book through the entirety of the Games, Katniss preserves her empathy. Time and time again, she chooses kindness over survival: She volunteers to take the place of Prim, protects Rue until she can’t, cares for Peetah, and takes mercy on Cato. She builds community with the traders in the seam, caring for others with the little she has. Her every action exemplifies the triumph of compassion over self-preservation; her every thought humanizes those whom the powerful endeavor to demean. So Katniss’ Game ends as it began—with humanity. It is fitting, perhaps, that this very same humanity is what brings about the Capitol’s downfall.
Our protagonist is an unusual hero in the sense that she does not at first, intend to correct the injustices of her world. She feels them deeply; she has lived them every second of her life, but resistance is something she never feels she can afford. Where she begins the narrative, Katniss’ sole desire is simply to protect her loved ones. She learns to hunt, not out of rebellion but out of necessity; it is in desperation, rather than defiance, that she and Peeta eat the berries. Katniss becomes entwined in the Capitol's figurative games because of her love for Prim, and it is her fatal kindness that compels her to pay tribute to Rue. Yet as she wakes up to, Katniss lives in a world in which compassion is an unavoidably revolutionary act.
Katniss Everdeen becomes the figurehead of the resistance because her regime has made her compassion political. She represents a threat to the Capitol’s power because she maintains community and solidarity in a system designed to elicit the inverse. Rather than maintaining that survival and compassion are mutually exclusive, a view that our protagonist is conditioned to believe, Collins thus asserts that both are fundamentally linked to the other. Katniss is unity incarnate, and that is why she is diametrically opposed to the ideologies of her state. It is only in collectivity that we move forward.
